EAA - Experimental Aircraft Association  

Infinite Menus, Copyright 2006, OpenCube Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Tools:   Bookmark and Share Font Size: default Font Size: medium Font Size: large

EAA Urges Members to Comment on Proposed Amateur-Built Certification Policy

 

August 29, 2008 — In mid-July the FAA published its proposed policy and said it would allow comments for only 30 days. In response, your EAA legislative-affairs representatives asserted the need for, and secured, an extension until Sept. 30.

This extension gives us all time to respond to a troublesome element of the FAA’s proposal — the suggestion that, for every amateur aircraft-building project, the builder’s work must include a minimum proportion of tasks in a fabrication category and a minimum proportion of tasks in an assembly category.

The FAA proposes to break down its evaluation of the amateur builder’s contribution to the project in the following manner:

  • at least 20% of total construction tasks must be fabrication done by the amateur;
  • at least another 20% of total construction tasks must be assembly done by the amateur; and that leaves another 11% of tasks for the amateur to complete from either category, to ensure a total 51% contribution to the project.

If you agree with EAAers who believe such “breakdown” requirements unnecessarily complicate and confuse the matter of the amateur builder’s hands-on construction obligations, please make your voice heard before Sept. 30. Please send your comments to the FAA using the contact information below, and also include a copy to EAA at govt@eaa.org, to enrich the EAA community's understanding of this issue and how it affects members.

e-mail: miguel.vasconcelos@faa.gov

U.S. Mail:
Miguel L. Vasconcelos
Production and Airworthiness Division
AIR-200, Room 815
800 Independence Ave., SW
Washington, D.C. 20591

fax: 202-267-8850

Copyright © 2014 EAA Advertise With EAA :: About EAA :: History :: Job Openings :: Annual Report :: Contact Us :: Disclaimer/Privacy :: Site Map